|

A nanopore in action. Above image: A hemolysin
channel has penetrated a lipid bilayer and conducts an open channel current
of about 120 picoamperes, with a voltage of 120 millivolts. Potassium
and chloride ions carry the current in 1.0 M KCl. Center image: When a
DNA hairpin is captured by the nanopore, it partially blocks the ionic
current, which is reduced by about half. Right image: A few milliseconds
later the DNA hairpin spontaneously unfolds and is drawn through the limiting
aperture of the hemolysin, producing a transient downward spike to about
10% of the open channel current. See Vercoutere et al. 2001.
If a nanopore is produced in a thin film that separates two compartments,
ionic current can be driven through the pore when a voltage is imposed
across the membrane containing the pore. Typical biological pores in cell
membranes pass currents in the picoampere range when a 100 mV potential
is applied and 0.1 M KCl is present. A large pore such as alpha hemolysin
passes 120 picoamperes of ionic current at the same potential in 1.0 M
KCl. Because typical molecules of biological relevance are in the nanometer
size range, they can enter a nanopore of appropriate diameter and affect
the ionic current flowing through the pore. An example is polyethylene
glycol, a globular molecule which was shown to enter the hemolysin pore
and produce measurable effects on the ionic current passing through the
pore (Bezrukov et al 1994) . Linear polymers such as nucleic acids can
also be drawn into the hemolysin pore. While they pass through the pore
the molecule partially interrupts the ionic current to produce a signal
called a blockade. Modulation of the ionic current blockade provides information
about the concentration, length and composition of the molecule. ( Kasianowicz
et al. 1996; Akeson et al. 1999; Meller et al. 2001). Similar measurements
have been made with a synthetic SiN pore (Li et al 2001).
Both the size and motion of a molecule passing through a nanopore modulate
the current in ways that give information about the molecule. To give
a few examples obtained with the hemolysin pore, Kasianowicz et al. 1996
showed that the duration of an ionic current blockade was roughly proportional
to the length of RNA strands ranging from 5 to 500 bases in length. Akeson
et al. (1999) demonstrated that RNA homopolymers of purines (polyadenylic
acid) and pyrimidines (polycytidylic acid) differed markedly in the blockade
signal they produced, and that a block copolymer (A30C70G)produced a blockade
with a distinct break that distinguished the A portion from the C portion.
Vercoutere et al. (2001) found that DNA hairpins ranging from 3 to 9 base
pairs could be distinguished with single base-pair resolution. Hworka
et al (2002) demonstrated that a DNA sequence seven bases in length could
be covalently bound to the hemolysin pore and gave a distinct signal when
a complementary sequence passed through the pore.
The state of the art in 2003 is to produce a synthetic nanopore that can
emulate the desirable properties of the hemolysin pore, yet be far more
robust so that it can be incorporated into a commercial instrument. An
exciting possibility for such a nanopore instrument is that it has the
potential to produce a vast improvement in sequencing rates. Because single
stranded nucleic acids pass through the pore in strict linear sequence,
in principle each base could be detected and read, much as the magnetic
head of a tape recorder reads the magnetic signal embedded in the tape.
If single base resolution becomes possible, nucleic acid sequences could
be obtained at rates thousands of times faster than currently possible.
Other applications of nanopores do not depend on direct sequencing. For
instance, synthetic nanopores should be able to serve as biosensors for
DNA hybridization and SNP detection, identifying targeted encoded polymers
as well as identifying proteins and viruses at with single molecule resolution.
The rest of this web site contains a history of the nanopore concept,
links and information about laboratories working on nanopores, and a news
page announcing meetings, publications, companies and grants related to
nanopores.
Akeson, M., D. Branton, J.J. Kasianowicz, E. Brandin, and D.W. Deamer,
Biophys. J. 77, 3227 (1999)
DeBlois, R.W., C.P. Bean and R.K.A.Wesley, J. Coll. Interface Sci. 61,
323 (1977)
Howorka, S., S. Cheley and H. Bayley, Nat Biotechnol 19, 636 (2001)
Kasianowicz, J., E. Brandin, D. Branton and D.W. Deamer, Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 93, 13770 (1996)
Li, J. D. Stein, C. McMullan, D. Branton, M. J. Aziz, and J. A. Golovchenko,
. Nature 412, 166 (2001)
Meller, A., L. Nivon, and D. Branton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86,3435 (2001)
Vercoutere, W., S. Winters-Hilt, H. Olsen, D. Deamer. D. Haussler and
M. Akeson Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 248 (2001)
|
 |
 |